AskCalc
Home › Emergency & Trauma › PECARN ≥2y

PECARN Pediatric Head Injury Rule (≥ 2 years)

For children 2–17 years with minor head trauma (GCS 14–15): CT recommended if GCS 14/altered mental status or signs of basilar skull fracture (ciTBI risk 4.3%); observation vs CT if any LOC, vomiting, severe mechanism or severe headache (0.9%); otherwise CT not recommended (<0.05%).

  • GCS 14 or other signs of altered mental status (yes/no, +1)
  • Signs of basilar skull fracture (yes/no, +1)
  • History of loss of consciousness (yes/no, +1)
  • History of vomiting (yes/no, +1)
  • Severe mechanism of injury (yes/no, +1)
  • Severe headache (yes/no, +1)
—

Interpretation

ResultMeaning
GCS 14/AMS or signs of basilar skull fractureCT recommended; ciTBI 4.3%
Any of: LOC, vomiting, severe mechanism, severe headacheObservation vs CT; ciTBI 0.9%
NoneCT not recommended; ciTBI <0.05%

Formula

Step 1: GCS 14 / altered mental status or signs of basilar skull fracture → CT. Step 2: history of LOC, vomiting, severe mechanism, or severe headache → observation vs CT. Otherwise → no CT.

Clinical pearls

  • Inclusion: children 2–17 y presenting within 24 h of head trauma with GCS 14–15. Excluded: trivial mechanisms (ground-level falls, walking or running into stationary objects with only scalp abrasions/lacerations), penetrating trauma, known brain tumours, pre-existing neurological disorders, ventricular shunts, bleeding disorders, or prior outside neuroimaging.
  • Severe mechanism (≥2 y): MVC with ejection, death of another passenger or rollover; pedestrian or unhelmeted cyclist struck by motorised vehicle; fall >5 ft (1.5 m); head struck by high-impact object.
  • Isolated findings in the intermediate group (e.g. vomiting alone) carry very low risk; observation is usually reasonable.

Examples

FAQ

Does an isolated episode of vomiting need a CT?

Not usually. Isolated vomiting places a child in the intermediate group, where observation is generally appropriate.

What counts as altered mental status?

GCS 14, or agitation, somnolence, repetitive questioning, or slow response to verbal communication.

Evidence

  1. Kuppermann N et al. Identification of children at very low risk of clinically-important brain injuries after head trauma: a prospective cohort study. Lancet 2009;374:1160–70.

Emergency & Trauma · Reviewed 2026-10-14 · Methodology