AskCalc
Home › Pulmonary & Critical Care › ABG interpreter

Arterial Blood Gas (ABG) Stepwise Interpreter

Stepwise acid–base interpretation: pH < 7.35 acidemia, > 7.45 alkalemia; primary disorder from pCO₂ (35–45) and HCO₃⁻ (22–26); expected compensation (Winters pCO₂ = 1.5 × HCO₃ + 8 ± 2; metabolic alkalosis 40 + 0.7 × ΔHCO₃ ± 5; respiratory 0.1/0.35 and 0.2/0.4 per mmHg); anion gap (albumin-corrected) and delta ratio.

  • pH
  • pCO₂ (mmHg or kPa)
  • HCO₃⁻ (mmol/L or mEq/L)
  • Sodium (optional) (mmol/L or mEq/L)
  • Chloride (optional) (mmol/L or mEq/L)
  • Albumin (optional) (g/dL or g/L)
—

Interpretation

ResultMeaning
pH < 7.35Acidemia
pH > 7.45Alkalemia
AG > 12 (albumin-corrected)High anion gap
Delta ratio < 0.4 / 0.4–0.8 / 0.8–2 / > 2NAGMA / mixed HAGMA+NAGMA / pure HAGMA / HAGMA + metabolic alkalosis

Formula

Winters: expected pCO₂ = 1.5 × HCO₃⁻ + 8 ± 2. Metabolic alkalosis: expected pCO₂ = 40 + 0.7 × (HCO₃⁻ − 24) ± 5. Respiratory acidosis: expected HCO₃⁻ = 24 + 0.1 (acute) or 0.35 (chronic) × (pCO₂ − 40). Respiratory alkalosis: 24 − 0.2 (acute) or 0.4 (chronic) × (40 − pCO₂). AG = Na − (Cl + HCO₃); corrected AG = AG + 2.5 × (4 − albumin g/dL). Delta ratio = (AG − 12) ÷ (24 − HCO₃).

Clinical pearls

  • Compensation never overcorrects pH; a "normal" pH with abnormal pCO₂ and HCO₃⁻ usually means a mixed disorder.
  • An anion gap ≥ 20 suggests a high-gap metabolic acidosis even when pH and HCO₃⁻ look normal.
  • Always correct the anion gap for low albumin (each 1 g/dL fall lowers the gap by ≈ 2.5); this tool applies rules only and cannot replace clinical context (e.g. osmolal gap, urine studies).

Examples

FAQ

How do you interpret an ABG step by step?

Check pH, identify whether pCO₂ or HCO₃⁻ explains it, check expected compensation, calculate the anion gap (corrected for albumin), then the delta ratio for hidden disorders.

What is Winters' formula?

Expected pCO₂ in metabolic acidosis = 1.5 × HCO₃⁻ + 8 ± 2. Higher pCO₂ means a coexisting respiratory acidosis; lower means respiratory alkalosis.

Evidence

  1. Berend K, de Vries APJ, Gans ROB. Physiological approach to assessment of acid–base disturbances. N Engl J Med 2014;371:1434–45.
  2. Rastegar A. Use of the ΔAG/ΔHCO3− ratio in the diagnosis of mixed acid-base disorders. J Am Soc Nephrol 2007;18:2429–31.

Pulmonary & Critical Care · Reviewed 2026-10-14 · Methodology