Interpretation
| Result | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Definite | 2 major; or 1 major + 3 minor; or 5 minor; or pathological criteria |
| Possible | 1 major + 1 minor; or 3 minor |
| Rejected | Firm alternative diagnosis, resolution with ≤ 4 days of antibiotics, or possible criteria not met |
Formula
Major (2): typical positive blood cultures (incl. single Coxiella culture or phase I IgG > 1:800); evidence of endocardial involvement. Minor (5): predisposition/IDU; fever ≥ 38 °C; vascular phenomena; immunologic phenomena; microbiologic evidence not meeting major. Definite = 2M, 1M + 3m, or 5m. Possible = 1M + 1m or 3m.
Clinical pearls
- The 2023 Duke-ISCVID criteria update these rules: they add PET/CT and cardiac CT imaging, PCR/sequencing, intraoperative inspection as a major criterion, more "typical" organisms, cardiac devices as predispositions, and drop blood-culture timing rules.
- TEE is more sensitive than TTE for vegetations and abscesses, particularly with prosthetic valves; a negative TTE does not exclude IE when suspicion is high.
- "Possible IE" still often warrants a full treatment course when S. aureus bacteremia or high clinical suspicion is present.
Examples
duke criteria staph aureus bacteremia with vegetation on teemodified duke: 1 positive blood culture, fever, ivdu, janeway lesionsendocarditis criteria strep viridans in 2 blood cultures, fever, no vegetation on echo
FAQ
What makes infective endocarditis "definite" by Duke criteria?
Two major criteria, one major plus three minor, five minor criteria, or pathological proof from a vegetation, embolus or abscess.
What changed in the modified Duke criteria?
Li 2000 added "possible IE" minimum thresholds (1 major + 1 minor or 3 minor), made S. aureus bacteremia a major criterion regardless of source, added Coxiella serology as major, and removed echocardiographic minor criteria.