Interpretation
| Result | Meaning |
|---|---|
| All criteria met | Low risk; careful observation without antibiotics was supported in the original studies |
| Any criterion not met | Not low risk; full sepsis evaluation and empiric antibiotics per protocol |
Formula
Low risk if ALL: well-appearing; previously healthy; no skin/soft tissue/bone/joint/ear infection; WBC 5–15 ×10⁹/L; bands ≤ 1.5 ×10⁹/L; spun urine ≤ 10 WBC/hpf; stool ≤ 5 WBC/hpf if diarrhea
Clinical pearls
- Rochester does not use procalcitonin or CRP; newer rules (PECARN, Step-by-Step, AAP 2021) are more sensitive for invasive infection in infants ≤ 21–28 days.
- Sensitivity for bacteremia and meningitis in neonates is lower than the NPV suggests; most guidelines still recommend full evaluation in infants ≤ 28 days.
Examples
rochester criteria 40 day old well appearing previously healthy wbc 9 bands 0.5 ua 2 wbc/hpffebrile 3 week old, term, looks well, no focal infection, WBC 16, bands 0.8, urine 3 wbcrochester rule infant wbc 12 bands 2.0 ua 15
FAQ
What are the Rochester criteria?
Criteria to identify febrile infants up to 60 days old at low risk of serious bacterial infection: well-appearing, previously healthy, no focal infection, WBC 5,000–15,000, bands ≤1,500, ≤10 WBC/hpf in urine, and ≤5 WBC/hpf in stool if diarrhea.
Rochester vs PECARN: which is better?
PECARN (urinalysis, ANC, procalcitonin) has higher sensitivity (97.7%) than Rochester; Rochester remains useful where procalcitonin is unavailable.
Evidence
- Jaskiewicz JA et al. Febrile infants at low risk for serious bacterial infection: an appraisal of the Rochester criteria. Pediatrics 1994;94:390–6.
- Dagan R et al. Identification of infants unlikely to have serious bacterial infection although hospitalized for suspected sepsis. J Pediatr 1985;107:855–60.