AskCalc
Home › Cardiology › GRACE

GRACE Score for In-Hospital Mortality in ACS

The GRACE score (Granger 2003) estimates in-hospital mortality across the ACS spectrum from age, heart rate, SBP, creatinine, Killip class, cardiac arrest, ST deviation and cardiac enzymes. For NSTE-ACS, ≤108 is low (<1%), 109–140 intermediate (1–3%), >140 high (>3%) risk.

  • Age (years)
  • Heart rate (/min)
  • Systolic blood pressure (mmHg or kPa)
  • Serum creatinine (mg/dL or µmol/L)
  • Killip class: I: no heart failure (0); II: rales/crackles, S3 or JVP raised (20); III: pulmonary edema (39); IV: cardiogenic shock (59)
  • Cardiac arrest at admission (yes/no, +39)
  • ST-segment deviation (yes/no, +28)
  • Elevated cardiac enzymes/markers (yes/no, +14)
—

Interpretation

ResultMeaning
≤ 60≤ 0.2%
1000.8%
1402.9%
1605.4%
1809.8%
20018%
22029%
24044%
≥ 250≥ 52%

Formula

Points: Killip (I 0, II 20, III 39, IV 59) · SBP (< 80: 58, 80–99: 53, 100–119: 43, 120–139: 34, 140–159: 24, 160–199: 10, ≥ 200: 0) · HR (< 50: 0, 50–69: 3, 70–89: 9, 90–109: 15, 110–149: 24, 150–199: 38, ≥ 200: 46) · Age (< 30: 0, 30–39: 8, 40–49: 25, 50–59: 41, 60–69: 58, 70–79: 75, 80–89: 91, ≥ 90: 100) · Creatinine mg/dL (< 0.4: 1, 0.4–0.79: 4, 0.8–1.19: 7, 1.2–1.59: 10, 1.6–1.99: 13, 2.0–3.99: 21, ≥ 4: 28) · cardiac arrest 39 · ST deviation 28 · elevated enzymes 14. Mortality from the published nomogram (points 60→0.2%, 70→0.3, 80→0.4, 90→0.6, 100→0.8, 110→1.1, 120→1.6, 130→2.1, 140→2.9, 150→3.9, 160→5.4, 170→7.3, 180→9.8, 190→13, 200→18, 210→23, 220→29, 230→36, 240→44, 250→52), linearly interpolated between 10-point steps.

Clinical pearls

  • This is the original in-hospital model; the GRACE 2.0 and 6-month post-discharge models use different equations and give different numbers.
  • Risk tertile cut-offs (108/140) are for NSTE-ACS; for STEMI the corresponding tertiles are higher (≤125, 126–154, ≥155).

Examples

FAQ

What GRACE score is high risk?

For NSTE-ACS, a GRACE in-hospital score above 140 (in-hospital mortality above 3%) is high risk and favours an early invasive strategy within 24 hours.

Is GRACE better than TIMI?

GRACE generally discriminates mortality better than TIMI, at the cost of more inputs; TIMI is simpler at the bedside.

Evidence

  1. Granger CB et al. Predictors of hospital mortality in the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events. Arch Intern Med 2003;163:2345–53.

Cardiology · Reviewed 2026-10-14 · Methodology